Skip to content

Advances in Quantum Defect Embedding Theory

MetadataDetails
Publication Date2025-08-13
JournalJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation
AuthorsSiyuan Chen, Victor Yu, Yu Jin, Marco Govoni, Giulia Galli
InstitutionsUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Materials Science & Engineering
Citations1
AnalysisFull AI Review Included

Technical Documentation & Analysis: Quantum Defect Embedding in Diamond

Section titled “Technical Documentation & Analysis: Quantum Defect Embedding in Diamond”

This research validates critical theoretical advancements in Quantum Defect Embedding Theory (QDET), specifically applied to solid-state quantum defects in diamond. The findings directly inform the material specifications required for next-generation quantum sensing and computing devices.

  • Core Achievement: Refined QDET formalism (DC2025) achieves improved agreement with experimental Vertical Excitation Energies (VEEs) for key diamond defects, including the Nitrogen-Vacancy (NV-) center and neutral Group IV vacancies (SiV0, GeV0, SnV0, PbV0).
  • Material Focus: The study centers on point defects in bulk diamond, requiring ultra-high purity, low-strain Single Crystal Diamond (SCD) substrates for physical realization.
  • Key Finding (NV-): Using the DDH hybrid functional and including unoccupied orbitals yielded a VEE of 2.235 eV, closely matching the experimental value of 2.18 eV.
  • Computational Scale: Simulations utilized large supercells (up to 511 atoms), emphasizing the need for large-area, homogeneous diamond wafers to minimize boundary effects in real devices.
  • Hybridization Effects: Hybridization between the active defect space and the environment was found to be negligible (≀ 0.07 eV), simplifying device design constraints related to surface proximity, provided high-quality bulk material is used.
  • Precision Requirement: Computational convergence required precision within 10 meV, underscoring the stringent material control necessary for reliable quantum device performance.

The following table summarizes key quantitative results and parameters extracted from the QDET calculations for diamond defects:

ParameterValueUnitContext
Host MaterialDiamond (C)N/AWide bandgap semiconductor
Defect Systems StudiedNV-, SiV0, GeV0, SnV0, PbV0N/ASolid-state spin qubits
Supercell Size (Max)511AtomsUsed for convergence testing
Target NV- VEE (Exp.)2.18eVHighest intensity peak
Computed NV- VEE (DDH/DC2025)2.235eVExcellent agreement with experiment
DDH Mixing Parameter ($\alpha$)0.18N/AInverse of bulk diamond dielectric constant
Computational Convergence Target10meVRequired precision for VEEs
Hybridization Effect (Max, Group IV)+0.07eVNegligible effect on state ordering
Hybridization Effect (Max, NV-)12meVNegligible after ensemble averaging
Cr(o-tolyl)4 Exp. VEE1.241eVMolecular qubit validation
Cr(o-tolyl)4 Computed VEE (Max)1.225eVExcellent agreement (within chemical accuracy)

The research employed a rigorous, multi-level computational workflow to refine QDET for strongly correlated defects:

  1. DFT Optimization: Atomic positions were optimized using unrestricted DFT calculations (Quantum ESPRESSO code) employing the PBE functional and SG15 PBE pseudopotentials.
  2. G0W0 Calculation: A G0W0 calculation (using the WEST code) was performed to obtain Kohn-Sham energies, wave functions, quasiparticle energies, screening, and polarizabilities.
  3. QDET Hamiltonian Construction: An effective Hamiltonian (Heff) was generated by partitioning orbitals into an active space (defect) and an environment (host), incorporating the refined DC2025 double-counting correction.
  4. Active Space Selection: The Minimum Model plus Kohn-Sham Energy (MM+KSE) criterion was used, incrementally adding occupied and unoccupied orbitals close to the Valence Band Maximum (VBM) and Conduction Band Minimum (CBM).
  5. Hybridization Inclusion (Auxiliary Hamiltonian): For advanced analysis, an auxiliary Hamiltonian (Haux) was constructed using extra “bath orbitals” selected based on their contribution (Sb) to the hybridization term $\Delta(\omega)$, reaching a threshold T = 2/3 (66.67%).
  6. Impurity Solvers: The effective Hamiltonians were diagonalized using high-level quantum chemistry solvers:
    • Full Configuration Interaction (FCI)
    • Selected Configuration Interaction (CI)
    • Multi-reference Configuration Interaction Single and Doubles (MR-CISD/CIS(D))
    • Auxiliary Field Quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) for validation.

This advanced theoretical work highlights the critical need for high-quality, large-area diamond substrates to realize these quantum defect systems. 6CCVD is uniquely positioned to supply the necessary MPCVD diamond materials and customization services required to transition this research into functional quantum devices.

The study focuses on point defects (NV-, SiV0, Group IV vacancies) which require the highest possible material purity and crystalline perfection to ensure long coherence times and stable optical properties.

Research Requirement6CCVD Material SolutionTechnical Specification
High Purity HostSingle Crystal Diamond (SCD)Ultra-low nitrogen and metallic impurity concentration necessary for stable spin qubits.
Scalability (511-atom supercells)Large-Area SCD/PCD WafersCustom dimensions available up to 125mm (PCD) and large-format SCD plates for multi-device integration.
Surface Sensitivity (Hybridization)Optical Grade PolishingSCD polishing to Ra < 1nm, ensuring minimal surface defects and strain that could interfere with localized quantum states.
Advanced Device IntegrationBoron-Doped Diamond (BDD)Available for creating integrated electrical contacts or p-n junctions adjacent to the defect layer, enabling electrical control of charge state (e.g., NV- to NV0).

The complexity of quantum defect fabrication often requires precise material engineering beyond standard wafers. 6CCVD offers comprehensive customization capabilities essential for replicating and extending this research:

  • Custom Dimensions and Thickness: We provide SCD and PCD plates/wafers with thicknesses ranging from 0.1”m to 500”m, and substrates up to 10mm thick, allowing researchers to optimize defect depth and device geometry.
  • Precision Polishing: Our in-house capability ensures surface roughness (Ra) < 1nm for SCD, critical for high-fidelity optical coupling and minimizing surface-induced decoherence.
  • Integrated Metalization: For creating electrical gates or contacts necessary for charge state control (as implied by the need for DDH functional calculations involving charge), 6CCVD offers custom metalization layers including Au, Pt, Pd, Ti, W, and Cu. This capability streamlines the fabrication of quantum devices based on NV- or SiV0 centers.

The theoretical advancements presented (DC2025, hybridization modeling, functional selection) demonstrate the highly specialized knowledge required for defect engineering.

  • Expert Consultation: 6CCVD’s in-house PhD team specializes in MPCVD growth and defect incorporation. We offer direct engineering support to assist researchers in selecting the optimal diamond material (e.g., specific nitrogen concentration, crystal orientation, or boron doping levels) required to realize the predicted VEEs and coherence properties of NV-, SiV0, and other Group IV vacancies.
  • Global Supply Chain: We ensure reliable global shipping (DDU default, DDP available) to support international research collaborations and rapid prototyping cycles.

For custom specifications or material consultation, visit 6ccvd.com or contact our engineering team directly.

View Original Abstract

Quantum defect embedding theory (QDET) is a many-body embedding method designed to describe condensed systems with correlated electrons localized within a given region of space, for example spin defects in semiconductors and insulators. Although the QDET approach has been successful in predicting the electronic properties of several point defects, several limitations of the method remain. In this work, we propose multiple advances to the QDET formalism. We derive a double-counting correction that consistently treats the frequency dependence of the screened Coulomb interaction, and we illustrate the effect of including unoccupied orbitals in the active space. In addition, we propose a method to describe hybridization effects between the active space and the environment, and we compare the results of several impurity solvers, providing further insights into improving the reliability and applicability of the method. We present results for defects in diamond and for molecular qubits, including a detailed comparison with experiments.