A Study on the Material Removal Characteristics and Damage Mechanism of Lapping for Pressureless Sintered Silicon Carbide (SSiC) Microlens Cavity
At a Glance
Section titled âAt a Glanceâ| Metadata | Details |
|---|---|
| Publication Date | 2023-05-31 |
| Journal | Micromachines |
| Authors | Tianfeng Zhou, Zhongyi Li, Weijia Guo, Peng Liu, Bin Zhao |
| Institutions | Beijing Institute of Technology, Chongqing University of Technology |
| Citations | 4 |
| Analysis | Full AI Review Included |
Technical Documentation & Analysis: Precision Machining of Hard Materials
Section titled âTechnical Documentation & Analysis: Precision Machining of Hard MaterialsâReference Paper: Zhou et al., âA Study on the Material Removal Characteristics and Damage Mechanism of Lapping for Pressureless Sintered Silicon Carbide (SSiC) Microlens Cavity.â Micromachines 2023, 14, 1162.
Executive Summary
Section titled âExecutive SummaryâThis analysis translates the findings regarding the precision machining of SSiC microlens molds into actionable material science requirements, highlighting 6CCVDâs superior CVD diamond solutions for high-wear optical applications.
- Challenge: Pressureless Sintered Silicon Carbide (SSiC), while thermally stable, is extremely hard (Hs > 115) and brittle, making high-efficiency lapping for optical quality difficult due to micro-fracturing and subsurface damage.
- Mechanism Identified: Material removal during lapping is governed by a combination of brittle mechanisms: ploughing, shearing, micro-cutting, and micro-fracturing, necessitating careful control of abrasive size.
- Abrasive Optimization: The study confirms that diamond abrasive particle size is critical. Larger particles (W20, 15-17 ”m) offer faster bulk removal via ploughing, while smaller particles (W7, 5-6 ”m) achieve better surface finish via cutting mechanisms.
- Process Solution: A âstep lappingâ approach (W7 followed by W20) was required to optimize both material removal rate and final surface quality, demonstrating the complexity of achieving optical finish on SSiC.
- 6CCVD Value Proposition: For high-wear applications like Precision Glass Molding (PGM) molds, 6CCVDâs Single Crystal Diamond (SCD) and Polycrystalline Diamond (PCD) offer intrinsic hardness and wear resistance far exceeding SSiC, simplifying the machining process and guaranteeing superior mold lifetime and optical fidelity.
- Surface Quality Guarantee: 6CCVD provides as-grown or polished diamond wafers with guaranteed surface roughness (Ra < 1nm for SCD), eliminating the need for complex, multi-stage lapping processes to achieve the required optical finish.
Technical Specifications
Section titled âTechnical SpecificationsâThe following hard data points were extracted from the experimental methodology:
| Parameter | Value | Unit | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workpiece Material | SSiC | N/A | Pressureless Sintered Silicon Carbide |
| SSiC Hardness | > 115 | Hs (Shore) | High hardness, prone to brittle fracture |
| SSiC Elastic Modulus | 410 | GPa | High stiffness |
| Initial SSiC Roughness (Ra) | 0.730 | ”m | Pre-lapping surface quality |
| Lapping Tool Material | WC | N/A | Cemented Tungsten Carbide (Spherical) |
| Lapping Tool Diameter | 10 | mm | Microlens cavity size constraint |
| Rotational Speed | 720 | degree/s | Lapping parameter |
| Feed Rate | 0.5 | ”m/s | Material removal rate control |
| Expected Machining Depth | 30 | ”m | Total material removed |
| Small Abrasive Size (W7) | 5.0-6.0 | ”m | Used for defect removal/finish |
| Large Abrasive Size (W20) | 15.0-17.0 | ”m | Used for bulk material removal |
| Abrasive Concentration | 6 | % | Diamond slurry composition |
| Minimum FEM Grid Size | 5 | nm | Simulation detail for surface analysis |
Key Methodologies
Section titled âKey MethodologiesâThe experimental study utilized a specialized lapping process combined with advanced characterization and simulation techniques:
- Lapping Platform: Experiments were conducted on a self-developed, C-shaped lapping platform featuring a marble stage for rigidity and grating rulers for precise X, Y, and Z control.
- Tooling: A spherical Cemented Tungsten Carbide (WC) tool head (10 mm diameter) was used. The rough surface morphology of the tool was intentionally designed to store abrasive slurry and facilitate chip extraction.
- Abrasive Slurry: Diamond abrasive slurry was used, consisting of 6% abrasive, 20% thickening agent, 24% dispersant, 16% lubricant, 22% blending agent, and 12% lapping assisting agent.
- Process Parameters: Lapping was performed at 720 degree/s rotational speed, 0.5 ”m/s feed rate, and a starting contact pressure of 0.1 N. Total material removal depth was 30 ”m.
- Step Lapping: To optimize results, a two-step process was tested: initial machining with small W7 particles (5-6 ”m) to remove surface defects, followed by W20 particles (15-17 ”m) for faster bulk material removal.
- Characterization: Surface morphology and elemental composition were analyzed using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX). Surface topography was measured using 3D laser confocal scanning microscopy.
- Simulation: Finite Element Method (FEM) modeling using AdvantEdge FEM was employed to simulate the single abrasive micro-cutting process and validate the observed material removal mechanisms (ploughing, shearing, micro-cutting).
6CCVD Solutions & Capabilities
Section titled â6CCVD Solutions & CapabilitiesâThe research highlights the inherent difficulties in achieving high-quality optical surfaces on hard, brittle materials like SSiC, requiring complex, multi-step lapping and careful abrasive management. 6CCVDâs CVD diamond materials offer a direct, superior alternative for PGM mold applications, providing extreme hardness and thermal stability with simplified finishing requirements.
Applicable Materials
Section titled âApplicable MaterialsâFor replicating or extending this research into high-performance PGM molds, 6CCVD recommends the following materials:
| Material Grade | Recommendation | Rationale for PGM Molds |
|---|---|---|
| Optical Grade SCD | Primary Recommendation | Highest hardness, thermal conductivity, and chemical inertness. Ideal for ultra-precision optics where Ra < 1nm is required. Eliminates brittle fracture issues inherent to SSiC. |
| Optical Grade PCD | Alternative for Large Molds | Available in large formats (up to 125 mm diameter). Excellent wear resistance for high-volume production. Can be polished to Ra < 5nm. |
| Boron-Doped Diamond (BDD) | For Integrated Heating | If the PGM mold requires integrated resistive heating elements, BDD provides the necessary electrical conductivity while maintaining diamondâs mechanical properties. |
Customization Potential
Section titled âCustomization Potentialâ6CCVDâs in-house manufacturing capabilities directly address the dimensional and finishing challenges encountered when machining hard materials for microlens arrays:
| Requirement from Research | 6CCVD Capability | Benefit to Customer |
|---|---|---|
| High-Precision Geometry | Custom laser cutting and shaping services. | We can supply diamond plates/wafers cut to precise dimensions (e.g., 15 mm x 15 mm, 0.5 mm thickness) or complex geometries required for mold inserts. |
| Large Format Molds | PCD wafers available up to 125 mm diameter. | Supports scaling up from the 10 mm tool diameter used in the study to industrial-scale microlens arrays. |
| Ultra-Smooth Finish | SCD polishing to Ra < 1nm; PCD polishing to Ra < 5nm. | Achieves optical quality finish before the customerâs final lapping/polishing steps, drastically reducing processing time and eliminating subsurface damage (cracks, pits) common in SSiC. |
| Tool Integration | Custom metalization (Au, Pt, Pd, Ti, W, Cu). | Allows for seamless integration of diamond molds into PGM heating and mounting systems, ensuring optimal thermal transfer and mechanical stability. |
| Thickness Control | SCD/PCD thickness control from 0.1 ”m up to 500 ”m (wafers) and substrates up to 10 mm. | Provides flexibility for thin-film diamond coatings or robust bulk mold inserts. |
Engineering Support
Section titled âEngineering SupportâThe complexity of optimizing lapping parameters (abrasive size, pressure, speed, slurry concentration) on SSiC demonstrates the need for expert material consultation.
6CCVDâs in-house PhD team specializes in the mechanical, thermal, and optical properties of CVD diamond. We offer comprehensive engineering support to assist researchers and manufacturers in:
- Material Selection: Determining the optimal SCD or PCD grade based on specific PGM temperature profiles and required mold lifetime.
- Process Optimization: Consulting on post-processing techniques (such as final polishing or etching) tailored specifically for diamond, ensuring the highest possible surface quality for microlens array projects.
- Failure Analysis: Utilizing our expertise to prevent issues like tool wear and non-uniform material removal observed in the SSiC study by leveraging the superior homogeneity and hardness of CVD diamond.
For custom specifications or material consultation, visit 6ccvd.com or contact our engineering team directly.
View Original Abstract
Microlens arrays have been widely employed to control the reflection, refraction, and diffraction characteristics of light due to its distinctive surface properties. Precision glass molding (PGM) is the primary method for the mass production of microlens arrays, of which pressureless sintered silicon carbide (SSiC) is a typical mold material due to its excellent wear resistance, high thermal conductivity, high-temperature resistance, and low thermal expansion. However, the high hardness of SSiC makes it hard to be machined, especially for optical mold material that requires good surface quality. The lapping efficiency of SSiC molds is quite low. and the underlying mechanism remains insufficiently explored. In this study, an experimental study has been performed on SSiC. A spherical lapping tool and diamond abrasive slurry have been utilized and various parameters have been carried out to achieve fast material removal. The material removal characteristics and damage mechanism have been illustrated in detail. The findings reveal that the material removal mechanism involves a combination of ploughing, shearing, micro-cutting, and micro-fracturing, which aligns well with the results obtained from finite element method (FEM) simulations. This study serves as preliminary reference for the optimization of the precision machining of SSiC PGM molds with high efficiency and good surface quality.
Tech Support
Section titled âTech SupportâOriginal Source
Section titled âOriginal SourceâReferences
Section titled âReferencesâ- 2019 - Preparation of dense and high-purity SiC ceramics by pressureless solid-state-sintering [Crossref]
- 2017 - Machining processes of silicon carbide: A review
- 2018 - Corrosion resistance of silicon-infiltrated silicon carbide (SiSiC) [Crossref]
- 2020 - Material removal characteristics of ultra-precision grinding silicon carbide ceramics [Crossref]
- 2017 - Investigation of silicon carbide ceramic polishing by simulation and experiment [Crossref]
- 2010 - Removal behaviors of different SiC ceramics during polishing [Crossref]
- 2014 - Study on removal mechanism and removal characters for SiC and fused silica by fixed abrasive diamond pellets [Crossref]
- 2017 - Experimental investigation on the surface and subsurface damages characteristics and formation mechanisms in ultra-precision grinding of SiC [Crossref]
- 2019 - 3D fabrication of spherical microlens arrays on concave and convex silica surfaces [Crossref]
- 2020 - Manufacturing of a microlens array mold by a two-step method combining microindentation and precision polishing [Crossref]