Skip to content

A size-consistent Grüneisen-quasiharmonic approach for lattice thermal conductivity

MetadataDetails
Publication Date2022-10-01
JournalEurophysics Letters (EPL)
AuthorsChee Kwan Gan, Eng Kang Koh
InstitutionsInstitute of High Performance Computing, Nanyang Technological University
AnalysisFull AI Review Included

Technical Documentation: Lattice Thermal Conductivity Prediction via GQA

Section titled “Technical Documentation: Lattice Thermal Conductivity Prediction via GQA”

This documentation analyzes the research paper “A size-consistent Grüneisen-quasiharmonic approach for lattice thermal conductivity” and highlights how 6CCVD’s advanced MPCVD diamond materials and engineering services are essential for validating and extending this high-performance thermal research.


  • Core Achievement: Proposal and validation of the Grüneisen-Quasiharmonic Approach (GQA) for calculating lattice thermal conductivity ($\kappa_l$) using first-principles Density Functional Theory (DFT) phonon calculations.
  • Methodological Improvement: The GQA introduces modifications to the traditional Slack formulae to ensure size consistency, particularly for complex crystal structures where the number of atoms in the primitive cell ($n$) is greater than one (e.g., wurtzite compounds, $n=4$).
  • Key Inputs: The approach accurately derives critical thermal parameters, including the Debye temperature ($\Theta_D$), acoustic Debye temperature ($\Theta_a$), and macroscopic Grüneisen parameters ($\gamma_a$).
  • Material Relevance: The study explicitly uses diamond as a benchmark material, confirming its superior thermal properties and validating the GQA’s ability to predict $\kappa_l$ for ultra-high thermal conductivity solids.
  • Validation: GQA predictions for $\kappa_l$ and $\gamma_a$ show closer agreement with experimental trends across diamond, zincblende, rocksalt, and wurtzite compounds compared to the Quasiharmonic Debye Model (QDM).
  • Application Focus: The GQA is expected to be an effective and practical predictor of $\kappa_l$, crucial for optimizing materials used in thermal management, heat dissipation, and thermoelectric devices.

The following hard data points were extracted from the computational methodology and results, focusing on parameters relevant to high-performance material modeling, particularly diamond.

ParameterValueUnitContext
Standard Comparison Temperature (T)300KTemperature used for $\kappa_l$ comparison
DFT Cutoff Energy600eVHigh energy cutoff used for VASP calculations
Atomic Relaxation Tolerance10-3eV/ÅMaximum force criterion for structure optimization
Grüneisen Parameter Strain±1%Strain applied in the finite central-difference scheme
Diamond Lattice Thermal Conductivity ($\kappa_l$) (GQA)~1000W/mKPredicted value at 300 K (Fig. 4)
Diamond Debye Temperature ($\Theta_D$)~1700KHighest $\Theta_D$ observed among tested materials (Fig. 1)
Diamond Acoustic Debye Temperature ($\Theta_a$)~1600KHighest $\Theta_a$ observed among tested materials (Fig. 2)
Cubic Supercell Size2 x 2 x 2N/AUsed for diamond, zincblende, and rocksalt compounds
Wurtzite Supercell Size3 x 3 x 2N/AUsed for SiC, GaN, ZnO, etc.

The Grüneisen-Quasiharmonic Approach (GQA) relies on a robust DFT workflow combined with specific post-processing steps to achieve size-consistent $\kappa_l$ prediction.

  1. Structure Optimization: Initial structures (from phonon databases) were optimized using DFT (VASP implementation) with projected augmented-wave pseudopotentials and the PBEsol functional. Atomic relaxation was halted when the maximum force was less than 10-3 eV/Å.
  2. Phonon Calculations: Phonon dispersion relations and density of states were calculated using the small-displacement method on specific supercells ($2 \times 2 \times 2$ for cubic, $3 \times 3 \times 2$ for wurtzite).
  3. Debye Temperature Determination ($\Theta_D$): The Debye cutoff frequency ($\nu_{min}$) was determined by minimizing the absolute error between the constant-volume heat capacity derived from the Debye model ($C_V^{D}$) and the DFT phonon calculations ($C_V^{DFT}$). $\Theta_D$ was then calculated as $h\nu_{min}/k_B$.
  4. Grüneisen Parameter Calculation ($\gamma_a$): Mode Grüneisen parameters ($\gamma_{\lambda \mathbf{q}}$) were calculated using a finite central-difference scheme with applied strains of ±1% relative to the equilibrium volume.
  5. Size-Consistent $\kappa_l$ Calculation: The acoustic Debye temperature ($\Theta_a$) and the lattice thermal conductivity at $\Theta_a$, $\kappa_l(\Theta_a)$, were calculated using modified Slack formulae (Equations 9, 10, and 11) to ensure size consistency, particularly for materials with large primitive cell atom counts ($n$).

The research confirms that diamond remains the benchmark material for ultra-high lattice thermal conductivity ($\kappa_l$). Replicating and extending this GQA modeling requires access to highly controlled, custom-engineered diamond substrates. 6CCVD is uniquely positioned to supply the necessary materials and services for advanced thermal physics research.

Research Requirement6CCVD Material RecommendationRationale
Validation of Highest $\kappa_l$ PredictionsOptical Grade Single Crystal Diamond (SCD)SCD offers the lowest defect density, maximizing intrinsic $\kappa_l$ (up to 2200 W/mK), essential for validating the GQA model’s predictions for ideal diamond structures.
Testing Complex Structures (e.g., Wurtzite analogs)High-Quality Polycrystalline Diamond (PCD)For large-area thermal spreaders or materials requiring specific grain boundaries (analogous to the complex structures modeled), 6CCVD offers PCD wafers up to 125 mm.
Thermoelectric/Electronic IntegrationBoron-Doped Diamond (BDD)BDD allows for tunable electrical conductivity while retaining high thermal properties, critical for experimental work in thermoelectrics and heat dissipation (Refs. [1, 5]).

The GQA method relies on precise material parameters and often requires testing samples that deviate from standard commercial sizes. 6CCVD’s custom capabilities directly address these engineering needs:

  • Custom Dimensions: We provide plates and wafers in custom sizes up to 125 mm (PCD) and offer precise laser cutting services to match the unique geometries required for specific experimental setups or device integration.
  • Thickness Control: We offer SCD and PCD layers with precise thickness control, ranging from 0.1 µm (thin films for interface studies) up to 500 µm (bulk substrates) and up to 10 mm for specialized substrates.
  • Advanced Metalization: The integration of high-$\kappa_l$ materials into devices requires robust thermal and electrical contacts. 6CCVD offers in-house metalization services, including deposition of Ti/Pt/Au, W, Cu, and Pd, ensuring low-resistance interfaces for accurate thermal measurement.
  • Surface Finish: To minimize surface phonon scattering effects that could skew experimental $\kappa_l$ measurements, our SCD is polished to an industry-leading roughness of Ra < 1 nm.

6CCVD’s in-house PhD team provides authoritative professional support for material selection and application development:

  • Material Selection for Thermal Projects: Our experts can assist researchers in selecting the optimal diamond material (SCD vs. PCD, specific doping levels) required to validate GQA predictions or design high-performance thermal barrier coatings and heat sinks.
  • Growth Parameter Consultation: We offer consultation on how MPCVD growth parameters influence defect density and, consequently, the resulting lattice thermal conductivity, providing a direct link between theoretical modeling and material synthesis.
  • Global Logistics: We ensure reliable global shipping (DDU default, DDP available) to deliver custom-engineered diamond materials directly to research facilities worldwide.

For custom specifications or material consultation, visit 6ccvd.com or contact our engineering team directly.

View Original Abstract

Abstract We propose a size-consistent Grüneisen-quasiharmonic approach (GQA) to calculate the lattice thermal conductivity <?CDATA $\kappa_l$ ?> where the Grüneisen parameters that measure the degree of phonon anharmonicity are calculated directly using first-principles calculations. This is achieved by identifying and modifying two existing equations related to the Slack formulae for <?CDATA $\kappa_l$ ?> that suffer from the size-inconsistency problem when dealing with non-monoatomic primitive cells (where the number of atoms in the primitive cell n is greater than one). In conjunction with other thermal parameters such as the acoustic Debye temperature <?CDATA $\theta_a$ ?> that can also be obtained within the GQA, we predict <?CDATA $\kappa_l$ ?> for a range of materials taken from the diamond, zincblende, rocksalt, and wurtzite compounds. The results are compared with that from the experiment and the quasiharmonic Debye model (QDM). We find that in general the prediction of <?CDATA $\theta_a$ ?> is rather consistent among the GQA, experiment, and QDM. However, while the QDM somewhat overestimates the Grüneisen parameters and hence underestimates <?CDATA $\kappa_l$ ?> for most materials, the GQA predicts the experimental trends of Grüneisen parameters and <?CDATA $\kappa_l$ ?> more closely. We expect the GQA with the modified Slack formulae could be used as an effective and practical predictor for <?CDATA $\kappa_l$ ?> , especially for crystals with large n .