Theoretical Insight Into Diamond Doping and Its Possible Effect on Diamond Tool Wear During Cutting of Steel

At a Glance

Metadata	Details
Publication Date	2021-12-14
Journal	Frontiers in Materials
Authors	Hao Li, Sergei Manzhos, Zhijun Zhang
Institutions	Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, State Key Laboratory of Chemobiosensing and Chemometrics
Citations	3
Analysis	Full AI Review Included

Technical Documentation & Analysis: Doped Diamond for Enhanced Tool Wear Resistance

This documentation analyzes the research paper “Theoretical Insight Into Diamond Doping and Its Possible Effect on Diamond Tool Wear During Cutting of Steel” and connects its findings directly to 6CCVD’s advanced MPCVD diamond capabilities, focusing on material solutions for high-performance cutting applications.

Executive Summary

This study utilizes ab initio calculations to investigate how doping (B, Ga, He) affects the mechanical and thermodynamic stability of diamond tools, specifically targeting the suppression of graphitization—the primary wear mechanism when cutting ferrous metals.

Core Mechanism: The research confirms that graphitization, catalyzed by ferrous metals at high temperatures, is the key route of diamond tool wear.
Mechanical Effects: Doping introduces strain energy (Es), which is directly correlated with mechanical softening (reduction in Bulk Modulus, BM). Interstitial Ga (I-Ga) caused the greatest softening.
Surface Stability: All three dopants (B, Ga, He) successfully reduce the surface energy of the diamond (110) and (111) facets, increasing surface stability and potentially reducing interaction at the tool-workpiece interface.
Graphitization Inhibition (Key Finding): Ga doping exhibited a completely opposite trend to B and He doping, requiring 2.49 eV to form the second graphene-like layer, thereby inhibiting graphitization and reducing chemical wear.
B-Doping Caution: While Boron (B) doping is common, the calculations show it significantly increases the binding energy (8.79 eV) between the diamond surface and Fe atoms, suggesting it may enhance chemical wear susceptibility.
Conclusion for Tooling: Ga-doped diamond is theoretically superior for suppressing chemical wear during ferrous metal cutting compared to pristine or B-doped diamond.

Technical Specifications

The following hard data points were extracted from the ab initio calculations, detailing the mechanical and thermodynamic effects of doping on diamond.

Parameter	Value	Unit	Context
Pristine Bulk Modulus (BM)	434.47	GPa	Theoretical baseline
Interstitial Ga (I-Ga) BM	398.30	GPa	Maximum mechanical softening observed
Substitutional B (S-B) BM	422.94	GPa	Least mechanical softening
S-Ga Strain Energy (Es)	4.94	eV	Correlated with mechanical softening
I-Ga Formation Energy (Ef)	20.48	eV	Thermodynamically unfavored configuration
S-B Formation Energy (Ef)	1.16	eV	Thermodynamically preferred configuration
Pristine Fe Binding Energy (E_bind)	6.81	eV	Baseline for Fe adsorption on (111) surface
S-B Fe Binding Energy (E_bind)	8.79	eV	Highest affinity for Fe (potential wear enhancement)
Graphitization Energy Barrier (Pristine)	2.42	eV	Energy released to form the second graphene layer
Graphitization Energy Barrier (Ga Doped)	2.49	eV	Energy required to form the second graphene layer (Inhibition effect)
(110) Surface Energy Decrease (Ga)	-9.44	%	Maximum surface energy reduction observed

Key Methodologies

The study relied on advanced computational materials science techniques to model the diamond lattice and dopant interactions.

Simulation Environment: Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations were performed using the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP).
Functional & Basis Set: The Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange-correlation functional and the Projector-Augmented Plane-Wave (PAW) method were employed.
Cell Structure: A cubic diamond cell containing 64 C atoms (7.14 Å x 7.14 Å x 7.14 Å) was used to model the bulk material.
Doping Configurations: Dopants (B, Ga, He) were investigated in both Interstitial (I) and Substitutional (S) positions within the lattice.
Convergence Criteria: A kinetic energy cutoff of 520 eV was selected. Energy and force convergence criteria were set rigorously at 1 x 10^-6 eV and 0.01 eV/Å, respectively.
Property Calculation: Key metrics calculated included Defect Formation Energy (E_f), Strain Energy (E_s), Bulk Modulus (BM) via pressure-volume fitting, and Surface Energy (γ) for the (110) and (111) facets.

6CCVD Solutions & Capabilities

The theoretical findings highlight the critical role of precise doping and surface engineering in developing next-generation diamond cutting tools. 6CCVD is uniquely positioned to transition this theoretical insight into physical, high-performance MPCVD diamond products.

Applicable Materials

To replicate or extend this research, 6CCVD offers the following specialized materials:

Optical Grade Single Crystal Diamond (SCD): Required as the high-purity base material for precision tool fabrication. Our SCD offers superior structural integrity necessary for ultra-precision machining and minimizing intrinsic defects.
Boron-Doped Diamond (BDD): Available for direct comparison and validation of the B-doping results (high Fe binding energy). We offer precise control over B concentration, enabling engineers to tune the electronic structure for specific electrochemical or mechanical tests.
Custom Doped SCD (Ga-Doped): The paper identifies Ga doping as the most promising route for graphitization suppression. 6CCVD’s expertise in custom MPCVD growth allows for the synthesis of Ga-doped SCD wafers necessary to experimentally validate the predicted 2.49 eV energy barrier.

Customization Potential

The success of advanced diamond tools relies on precise control over geometry, surface finish, and interface chemistry—all core competencies of 6CCVD.

Research Requirement	6CCVD Capability	Engineering Advantage
Specific Crystal Orientation	SCD Substrate Control: Growth on specific orientations (e.g., (111) facet, as studied in the paper) is standard.	Ensures experimental validation matches the theoretical models focusing on the {111} graphitization plane.
Tool Dimensions	Custom Dimensions: SCD/PCD plates and wafers available up to 125 mm (PCD) and substrates up to 10 mm thick.	Supports the fabrication of industrial-scale cutting tools and micro-features required for ultra-precision processing.
Ultra-Low Surface Roughness	Precision Polishing: SCD polishing capability to achieve Ra < 1 nm.	Minimizes mechanical friction and surface defects, which are critical factors in reducing initial wear and chemical reactivity.
Interface Chemistry Control	Custom Metalization: Internal capability to deposit Au, Pt, Pd, Ti, W, and Cu layers.	Essential for simulating the diamond-ferrous metal interface and testing the effect of dopants on chemical reactions and Fe diffusion, as discussed in the paper.

Engineering Support

The findings regarding the detrimental effects of B-doping (high Fe binding energy) versus the beneficial effects of Ga-doping (graphitization suppression) are critical for engineers designing tools for ferrous metal cutting.

6CCVD’s in-house PhD team specializes in MPCVD growth kinetics and material characterization. We offer consultation services to assist researchers and engineers in selecting the optimal material specifications (dopant type, concentration, crystal orientation, and surface finish) for similar high-wear, ferrous machining projects.

For custom specifications or material consultation, visit 6ccvd.com or contact our engineering team directly.

View Original Abstract

Natural diamond tools experience wear during cutting of steel. As reported in our previous work, Ga doping of diamond has an effect on suppressing graphitization of diamond which is a major route of wear. We investigate interstitial and substitutional dopants of different valence and different ionic radii (Ga, B, and He) to achieve a deeper understanding of inhibiting graphitization. In this study, ab initio calculations are used to explore the effects of three dopants that might affect the diamond wear. We consider mechanical effects via possible solution strengthening and electronic effects via dopant-induced modifications of the electronic structure. We find that the bulk modulus difference between pristine and doped diamond is clearly related to strain energies. Furthermore, boron doping makes the resulting graphite with stable sp2 hybridization more perfect than diamond, but Ga-doped diamond needs 2.49 eV to form the two graphene-like layers than only one layer, which would result in the suppressed graphitization and reduced chemical wear of the diamond tool.

Tech Support

Original Source

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.806466

References

1994 - Projector Augmented-Wave Method [Crossref]
2019 - Myths about New Ultrahard Phases: Why Materials that Are Significantly superior to diamond in Elastic Moduli and Hardness Are Impossible [Crossref]
2020 - Influence of Helium Ion Irradiation on the Structure and Strength of diamond [Crossref]
2007 - Processing and Characterization of Impregnated diamond Cutting Tools Using a Ferrous Metal Matrix [Crossref]
2017 - Recent Advances in Micro- and Nano-Machining Technologies [Crossref]
2015 - Role of Sp3/sp2 Ratio on the Electrocatalytic Properties of boron-doped diamond Electrodes: A Mini Review [Crossref]
2016 - Graphene Grown Out of diamond [Crossref]
1996 - Efficiency of Ab-Initio Total Energy Calculations for Metals and Semiconductors Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set [Crossref]
1996 - Efficient Iterative Schemes Forab Initiototal-Energy Calculations Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set [Crossref]