Skip to content

Исследование структурных и морфологических свойств HPHT алмазных подложек

MetadataDetails
Publication Date2018-01-01
JournalФизика и техника полупроводников
AuthorsП.А. Юнин, П. В. Волков, Ю Н Дроздов, А.В. Колядин, С. А. Королев
AnalysisFull AI Review Included

Technical Documentation & Analysis: HPHT Diamond Substrate Characterization

Section titled “Technical Documentation & Analysis: HPHT Diamond Substrate Characterization”

This documentation analyzes the structural and morphological defects identified in commercial HPHT diamond substrates, highlighting the critical need for advanced material characterization and superior material quality, capabilities offered directly by 6CCVD’s MPCVD manufacturing process.

HPHT diamond substrates marketed for high-quality Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) homoepitaxy exhibit significant structural and morphological defects requiring specific characterization beyond typical jewelry grading.

  • Problem Identification: Characterization based solely on “jewelry type” is insufficient for electronic-grade CVD diamond growth, leading to unpredictable epitaxial results.
  • Morphological Defects: Substrates demonstrated critical geometric imperfections, including poor face non-parallelism (wedge up to 20 µm), significant central bow/warp (1-2 µm), and unacceptable medium-scale roughness (up to 9.5 nm).
  • Polishing Artifacts: Large-scale surface deformation (low Rsur) was identified as primarily a consequence of the polishing process, not inherent bulk lattice strain (Rlat > 100 m).
  • Structural Non-Uniformity: X-ray Diffraction (XRD) confirmed significant variations in both lattice parameter (a) and structural quality (Δω up to 64 arc seconds) across the face of single substrates, compromising epitaxial homogeneity.
  • Critical Need: Routine, non-destructive diagnostic methods are necessary to control critical parameters (e.g., surface roughness Ra < 1 nm, wedge angle < 0.2°) before substrates are used for electronic applications.
  • Solution: 6CCVD provides materials engineered specifically for epitaxy, ensuring ultra-low roughness and tight structural specifications necessary for high-performance device fabrication.
ParameterValue RangeUnitContext/Method
Substrate Dimensions3.5 × 3.5 to 4 × 4mmInvestigated Commercial HPHT Samples (001)
Thickness Variation (Wedge)Up to 20µmLow Coherence Optical Interferometry (Sub2)
Opposite Face AngleUp to 0.3°Derived from max thickness wedge
Central Surface Bow/Warp1-2µmOIMBS/Talysurf Analysis
Off-Cut Angle (Δ)0.1-1.5°Measured, lower for Monosectoral Substrates
Micro-Scale Roughness (σ ACM)0.2-1.0nmAFM (1 x 1 µm frame)
Medium-Scale Roughness (σ OIMBS)1.7-9.5nmOptical Interferometry (1 x 1 mm frame)
Optical Surface Curvature (R sur)2-13mLow radius indicating high deformation
Lattice Curvature (R lat)> 100mHigh radius indicating minimal bulk strain
XRD Rocking Curve Width (Δω 004)30-64arc seconds (“)Average width range across all substrates
Lattice Parameter (a)3.5665-3.5670ÅVariation due to impurity concentration/zones
Δω Standard Deviation (S(Δω))1-13arc seconds (“)Non-uniformity calculated over 9 points

The study utilized a multi-scale, complementary approach to characterize the substrates, combining optical, morphological, and structural analysis techniques.

  1. Low Coherence Optical Interferometry:

    • Purpose: Mapping bulk thickness variation and wedge geometry.
    • Method: Utilizes broadband light source coherence length to measure optical path difference, revealing non-parallelism (wedge) between faces.
  2. White Light Optical Interference Microscopy (OIMBS):

    • Purpose: Measuring surface morphology and medium-scale roughness (Ra).
    • Equipment: Talysurf CCI 2000 and Zygo New View 7300.
    • Process: Characterized field of view up to 0.9 x 0.9 mm and whole substrate surfaces, identifying macro-defects like diagonal polishing scratches and central bow.
  3. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM):

    • Purpose: Measuring micro-scale roughness (σ ACM) down to the sub-nanometer level.
    • Equipment: CMM-2000.
    • Parameters: Frame size 1 x 1 µm. Essential for resolving small-scale surface features left by final polishing steps.
  4. High-Resolution X-Ray Diffractometry (XRD):

    • Purpose: Mapping structural quality (Δω) and lattice parameter (a).
    • Equipment: Bruker D8 Discover, high-resolution scheme.
    • Setup: Used a Ge(220) four-reflection monochromator and a 0.3 mm collimator.
    • Mapping: Measurements taken at 9 points (3 × 3 grid, 1.5 mm step) to determine spatial uniformity of (004) reflection rocking curve width (Δω) and Bragg angle.
  5. Off-Cut Angle Measurement:

    • Purpose: Determine the deviation (Δ) of the surface relative to the crystallographic (001) plane. This angle strongly affects etching rates in plasma.

The findings of this paper confirm that achieving electronic-grade performance requires precise control over morphology and structural integrity—exactly the strengths of 6CCVD’s engineered MPCVD diamond. We offer customized solutions that resolve the critical deficiencies identified in commercial HPHT materials.

To replicate or extend this research with superior structural uniformity and surface quality, 6CCVD recommends:

  • Optical Grade SCD (Single Crystal Diamond): Optimized for minimal impurities and structural uniformity, ensuring low Δω values (significantly better than the 30”-60” reported) essential for high-quality homoepitaxy.
  • Electronic Grade SCD Substrates: Ideal for achieving the necessary high structural quality and purity required for advanced electronic device fabrication.
  • Heavy Boron Doped PCD or BDD Substrates: For applications requiring conductivity or specialized electrochemical properties, manufactured with uniform doping profiles.

Technical Advantage & Customization Potential

Section titled “Technical Advantage & Customization Potential”

The paper clearly states that polishing technology caused severe surface bowing and high medium-scale roughness (up to 9.5 nm). 6CCVD directly addresses this primary failure point:

Defect Identified in Paper6CCVD Engineering SolutionCapability Specification
High Medium-Scale Roughness (1.7-9.5 nm)Advanced proprietary chemo-mechanical polishing (CMP)Ra < 1 nm (SCD) or Ra < 5 nm (Inch-size PCD)
Severe Bowing/Warping (Polishing Artifact)Stress-free polishing techniques and strict metrologySubstrates guaranteed minimal residual stress and near-zero bow/wedge.
Small Lateral Dimensions (4 x 4 mm)Large area manufacturing capabilityPCD plates/wafers up to 125 mm
Structural Non-Uniformity (Variable Δω, ‘a’)High-purity MPCVD growth controlConsistent crystallographic quality and precise orientation control, including targeted off-cut angles (Δ < 0.2°).

6CCVD’s in-house PhD engineering team understands the critical relationship between substrate quality and epitaxy success. We assist customers in material selection for similar High-Quality CVD Homoepitaxial Growth projects, ensuring material specifications meet the demands for tight control over structural (Δω) and morphological (Ra, wedge angle) parameters.

We offer:

  • Custom Dimensions and Thickness: SCD layers from 0.1 µm up to 500 µm, grown on highly uniform substrates (up to 10 mm thick).
  • Precision Orientation: Substrates delivered with measured and verified off-cut angles, crucial for step-flow growth and uniform etching, addressing the variable Δ identified in the research.
  • Custom Metalization: Full internal capability to apply necessary thin films (Au, Pt, Pd, Ti, W, Cu) for device processing directly onto the SCD or PCD material.

For custom specifications or material consultation, visit 6ccvd.com or contact our engineering team directly.

View Original Abstract

AbstractThe morphological and structural properties of a series of high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) single-crystal diamond substrates are comprehensively studied by white-light optical interference microscopy, atomic-force microscopy, and X-ray diffraction analysis. Procedures that provide a means for characterizing the substrate parameters most critical for epitaxial application with the laboratory equipment are described. It is shown that the jewelry-type characterization of diamond substrates is insufficient to assess the possibility of their use for the epitaxial growth of chemical-vapor-deposited (CVD) diamond.