Skip to content

Quantum state transfer and conditional phase gate via off-resonant quantum Zeno dynamics

MetadataDetails
Publication Date2016-09-07
JournalOptics Communications
AuthorsWan-Jun Su, Zhen‐Biao Yang, Huai‐Zhi Wu
InstitutionsFuzhou University
Citations6
AnalysisFull AI Review Included

Conditional Phase Gate and Quantum State Transfer using MPCVD NV Diamond

Section titled “Conditional Phase Gate and Quantum State Transfer using MPCVD NV Diamond”

Technical Documentation and QIP Material Sourcing Guide

Section titled “Technical Documentation and QIP Material Sourcing Guide”

6CCVD Analysis Reference: Su, W. J. (2017). Conditional phase gate and quantum state transfer via off-resonant quantum Zeno dynamics. arXiv:1705.04759v1.


This research demonstrates a highly robust theoretical scheme for fundamental Quantum Information Processing (QIP) primitives—Quantum State Transfer (QST) and Conditional Phase Gate (CPG)—using nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond coupled to a microcavity quantum bus.

  • Core Material: The scheme relies on two individual NV centers embedded in high-quality diamond, interacting with a high-Q microcavity (e.g., microsphere resonator).
  • Methodology: Implementation utilizes off-resonant Quantum Zeno Dynamics (QZD) under large detuning ($|\Delta| \gg \Omega$), ensuring the quantum interaction is a virtual-photon process.
  • Decoherence Immunity: By preventing population of both the cavity field and the NV center excited levels, the scheme achieves strong immunity against major decoherence sources: cavity decay ($\kappa$) and atomic spontaneous emission ($\gamma$).
  • Performance: Achieved optimal fidelity of > 0.998 for QST and high robustness, maintaining > 94.5% fidelity for CPG even in the presence of realistic dissipation.
  • Speed: QST operations are projected to be rapid (approximately 200 ns), significantly shorter than the NV center’s room-temperature decoherence time (known to exceed 600 ”s).
  • 6CCVD Relevance: Successful experimental realization requires high-purity Single Crystal Diamond (SCD) wafers with precise NV incorporation and custom geometry for seamless integration into microcavity systems.

The following parameters define the operational regime and expected performance of the QST and CPG protocols based on the numerical simulations and experimental feasibility discussion (Section 6).

ParameterValueUnitContext
Optimal QST Fidelity> 0.998N/AUnder ideal conditions ($\Delta/g = 0.5, \Omega/g = 0.05$)
Robust CPG Fidelity94.5%N/AUnder high dissipation ($\gamma/g = 0.01, \kappa/g = 0.2$)
QST Operation Time~200nsUsing realistic QED parameters
NV Center Coherence Time ($T_{2}$)> 600”sObserved room-temperature lifetime [39]
Quantum Zeno Detuning Ratio ($\Delta / \Omega$)10N/ABased on median values $0.5g / 0.05g$
NV-Cavity Coupling ($g/2\pi$)1GHzFeasibility parameter (hundreds of MHz to several GHz)
Cavity Leakage Rate ($\kappa/2\pi$)0.12GHzRequired for high-Q microsphere cavity
Spontaneous Decay Rate ($\gamma/2\pi$)0.015GHzNV spontaneous decay rate
Required Cavity Quality Factor (Q)> 2 x 106N/AMinimizes photon leakage
CPG Sensitivity to Shift Time ($\delta t/t$)InsensitiveN/AOptimal fidelity maintained for $\delta t/t \le \pm 0.1$

The schemes for QST and CPG rely on precise control over NV center energy levels and coupling strengths within a high-Q cavity environment.

  1. Physical Setup: Two spatially separated NV centers are coupled simultaneously to a single high-Q microcavity (e.g., microtoroidal or microsphere resonator), which functions as the quantum bus.
  2. NV Qubit Configuration: The NV centers are modeled in a $\Lambda$ configuration, using two ground states ($\vert g \rangle$ and $\vert f \rangle$) and one excited state ($\vert e \rangle$). An ancillary ground state ($\vert i \rangle$) is also utilized.
  3. Off-Resonant Coupling:
    • The $\vert g \rangle \leftrightarrow \vert e \rangle$ transition is coupled to the cavity field with coupling strength $g$.
    • The $\vert f \rangle \leftrightarrow \vert e \rangle$ transition is driven by a classical microwave field with Rabi frequency $\Omega$.
    • A large detuning ($\Delta$) is maintained between the NV transitions and the cavity mode ($|\Delta| \gg g$ and $|\Delta| \gg \Omega$).
  4. Quantum Zeno Dynamics (QZD): The large detuning and coupling conditions enforce the system evolution within a closed quantum Zeno subspace (spanned by $\vert gf \rangle \vert 0 \rangle_c$ and $\vert fg \rangle \vert 0 \rangle_c$), effectively freezing unwanted transitions.
  5. Virtual-Photon Interaction: Due to the large detuning, the interaction becomes a virtual-photon process. The excited states of the NV centers and the cavity field are not populated, which provides the primary robustness against decay mechanisms.
  6. Gate Implementation:
    • QST: Achieved by selecting an interaction time $t’$ such that $(\Omega^{2}/\Delta)t’ = \pi$, resulting in the transfer of an arbitrary state from NV1 to NV2.
    • CPG: Implemented by modifying the phases ($\phi_1, \phi_2$) of the classical driving fields over a total interaction period $T = 2\pi\Delta/\Omega^{2}$, inducing a geometric phase shift $\pi$.

The successful realization of solid-state QIP protocols based on NV centers, as proposed in this paper, critically depends on the quality and dimensional precision of the diamond material. 6CCVD is uniquely positioned to supply the requisite components for this advanced research.

To replicate or extend this quantum Zeno research, researchers require diamond substrates engineered for minimal decoherence and maximal NV center fidelity.

  • Optical Grade Single Crystal Diamond (SCD): Essential for QIP due to its high purity, necessary for maximizing the electron spin coherence time ($T_{2} > 600\ \text{”s}$).
    • Recommendation: Ultra-low nitrogen concentration SCD (Type IIa equivalent or better), ideally isotopically purified ${}^{12}\text{C}$ material, to minimize parasitic decoherence from substitutional nitrogen ($P1$ centers) and ${}^{13}\text{C}$ nuclear spins.
  • Custom NV Layering: We offer precise growth of SCD layers with tailored NV density (via in-situ nitrogen doping or post-growth implantation) confined close to the surface for efficient coupling to microcavity evanescent fields.

Experimental implementation of this scheme requires integrating diamond components with high-Q microresonators (e.g., microsphere cavities [34]). This necessitates precise dimensional control and geometric features.

Research Requirement6CCVD CapabilityBenefits for QIP
Nanocavity IntegrationCustom Thinning & Polishing: SCD plates down to 0.1 ”m thickness.Enables the creation of high-Q diamond nanopillars or waveguides via subsequent etching.
Microresonator CouplingCustom Dimensions: Wafers/plates up to 125mm size, allowing for standardized processing.Provides scalable, uniform QIP substrates.
Precise GeometryLaser Cutting & Shaping: Custom shapes and precise geometric features.Necessary for creating cantilevers or small diamond chips for placement near micro-resonator equators (critical for evanescent coupling).
Electrical Contact (Future Steps)Metalization Services (Au, Pt, Ti, Pd): In-house capability for custom contact layouts.Supports electrical manipulation of NV states or integration into superconducting hybrid systems (as referenced in [35]).
Surface QualityPrecision Polishing: Surface roughness $R_a < 1\ \text{nm}$ (SCD) on the growth face.Crucial for minimizing surface defects that can introduce decoherence or reduce optical coupling efficiency.

The robust fidelity achieved in this off-resonant QZD scheme hinges on achieving strict material and coupling specifications ($g, \kappa, \gamma$). 6CCVD’s in-house PhD material science team understands these constraints. We provide expert consultation to select the optimal diamond grade, doping, orientation, and surface termination required for similar quantum computing, QST, and CPG projects.

For custom specifications or material consultation, visit 6ccvd.com or contact our engineering team directly.

  1. 1993 - A potentially realizable quantum computer [Crossref]
  2. 2000 - Efficient scheme for two-atom entanglement and quantum information processing in cavity QED [Crossref]
  3. 2003 - Quantum communication through an unmodulated spin chain [Crossref]
  4. 2007 - Entanglement of single-atom quantum bits at a distance [Crossref]
  5. 2002 - Architecture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer [Crossref]
  6. 2004 - Observation of entanglement between a single trapped atom and a single photon [Crossref]
  7. 2004 - Coherent electronic transfer in quantum dot systems using adiabatic passage [Crossref]
  8. 2010 - Quantum information transfer with superconducting flux qubits coupled to a resonator [Crossref]
  9. 2003 - Quantum information processing with superconducting qubits in a microwave field [Crossref]
  10. 2013 - Heralded entanglement between solid-state qubits separated by three metres [Crossref]